So yes — in the Medina (Hafs) mushaf, مَلِكِ (or more precisely “مَٰلِكِ” with a small dagger alif) is used, not a full alif مَالِكِ. so there is no variance between medina Mushaf and modern warsh version Quran

 

Sura Fatiha from pure modern medina Mushaf in Arabic with screen shot, here maliki is written as مَلِكِ.

ChatGPT said:

Good point. Here’s the relevant evidence:

• On the Wikisource page of the Mushaf al‑Madīnah (Hafs), Surah al‑Fātiḥah (1:4) is written: مَٰلِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّينِ. Wikisource
• In the “Digital Uthmani” version on Wikisource too, it is مَٰلِكِ (no long alif). Wikisource
• On the Noor al‑Quran site (King Fahd edition), the Arabic text of Fātiḥah shows مَٰلِكِ. nourelquran.net+1

So yes — in the Medina (Hafs) mushaf, مَلِكِ (or more precisely “مَٰلِكِ” with a small dagger alif) is used, not a full alif مَالِكِ.

---

If you like, I can check old and modern Warsh mushafs side-by-side (for Fātiḥah 1:4) in high-resolution scanned images, so you can see exactly how “مَلِكِ / مَالِكِ” is written. Do you want me to do that?

You said:

So yes — in the Medina (Hafs) mushaf, مَلِكِ (or more precisely “مَٰلِكِ” with a small dagger alif) is used, not a full alif مَالِكِ. so there is no variance between medina Mushaf and modern warsh version Quran

ChatGPT said:

Exactly — that’s correct.

In Fātiḥah 1:4, both:

• Medina Mushaf (Hafs)
• Modern Warsh Mushaf (Morocco, Algeria, etc.)

show مَلِكِ (with a small dagger alif “ـٰ” if present, called dagger alif), not a full alif مَالِكِ.

✅ This means:

• There is no variance in the written text (rasm) between the Medina Mushaf and modern Warsh Qur’an for this word.
• Any previous claims of “modern Warsh changed it to مَالِكِ” are incorrect — the modern Warsh Mushaf follows the same Uthmanic rasm as the Medina Mushaf.
• The canonical Warsh qirā’ah pronunciation remains intact; only the rasm/spelling is preserved exactly as in Uthmanic tradition.

So, for this verse, both mushafs are fully aligned