No, Were it not for you, I would not have created the celestial spheres / universe saying is widely circulated in Islamic literature, but the famous wording is not an authentic hadith of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

 No, this saying is widely circulated in Islamic literature, but the famous wording is not an authentic hadith of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

1. The famous narration

Arabic:

لَوْلَاكَ لَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْأَفْلَاكَ

Transliteration: Lawlāka lamā khalaqtu al-aflāk.

Meaning: “Were it not for you, I would not have created the celestial spheres / universe.”

Scholars such as al-Ṣaghānī and al-Shawkānī classified this report as fabricated (mawḍūʿ). The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta also ruled that it has no established basis as a prophetic hadith.

Al-Fatawa

+1

2. What does the Qur’an say about why Allah created us?

Allah says:

وَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْجِنَّ وَالْإِنْسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ

“And I did not create the jinn and humankind except to worship Me.” — Qur’an 51:56.

And in Qur’an 65:12, Allah explains that He created the heavens and the earth so that people may know that He has power over all things and that His knowledge encompasses everything.

Al-Fatawa

+1

3. Does this mean Prophet Muhammad ﷺ has no special status?

No. The Qur’an describes him as a mercy to all the worlds:

وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِلْعَالَمِينَ

“And We have not sent you except as a mercy to the worlds.” — Qur’an 21:107.

This establishes his extraordinary role as a messenger and mercy. However, it does not explicitly say that Allah would not have created the universe without him.

Conclusion: We should distinguish between three things:

• The Prophet ﷺ has a special and exalted status in Islam.

• The Qur’an identifies worship of Allah as the purpose of creating jinn and humankind.

• The statement “Were it not for you, I would not have created the universe” cannot reliably be attributed to the Prophet ﷺ as an authentic hadith.

For further reading, see the Permanent Committee’s ruling on this narration.

Convert to PDF

The source of “Were it not for you, I would not have created the universe”

The saying “Were it not for you, I would not have created the universe” is commonly associated with the Arabic phrase:

لَوْلَاكَ لَمَا خَلَقْتُ الْأَفْلَاكَ

Lawlāka lamā khalaqtu al-aflāk.

The important question is not only who transmitted it, but where it first appeared in the literature and whether it can be traced to the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ through a reliable chain of transmission.

The phrase is not established as an authentic prophetic hadith. Its circulation in later Islamic literature does not, by itself, prove that the Prophet ﷺ said it.

Earliest identifiable source

The traceable scholarly references point to the following:

1. Al-Ṣaghānī (d. 650 AH / 1252 CE) — his work al-Mawḍūʿāt identifies the saying as fabricated. Al-Ṣaghānī is one of the earliest named hadith critics cited for this specific wording.

   

   الإسلام سؤال وجواب

   +1

2. Al-Shawkānī (d. 1250 AH / 1834 CE) — al-Fawāʾid al-Majmūʿah fī al-Aḥādīth al-Mawḍūʿah, p. 326 in the cited edition, records the verdict attributed to al-Ṣaghānī.

   

   Al-Fatawa

   +1

3. Al-ʿAjlūnī (d. 1162 AH / 1749 CE) — Kashf al-Khafāʾ, discusses the saying and the earlier criticism of its attribution.

   

   Al-Fatawa

   +1

There are also similar narrations attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās in later works, including reports associated with al-Ḥākim's al-Mustadrak and al-Daylamī's Firdaws al-Akhbār. These have serious problems with their chains and are not reliable proof of the famous statement.

الإسلام سؤال وجواب

+1

Important distinction: Al-Ṣaghānī is an early identifiable source for the criticism of the saying, not a verified source for a genuine prophetic narration. I cannot establish who first coined the phrase or the exact date it first circulated.

You can consult the discussion of its authenticity and source references.

Convert to PDF

here are also similar narrations attributed to Ibn ʿAbbās in later works, including reports associated with al-Ḥākim's al-Mustadrak and al-Daylamī's Firdaws al-Akhbār. These have serious problems with their chains and are not reliable proof of the famous statement.

The specific reports and their problems

Source	Report attributed to	Main issue
Al-Mustadrak, al-Ḥākim, 2/615 in the cited edition	Ibn ʿAbbās (RA)	The chain contains ʿAmr ibn Aws, whose status is unknown; al-Dhahabī criticized the report as objectionable and suspected fabrication. IslamQA +1
Musnad al-Firdaws, al-Daylamī	Ibn ʿAbbās (RA)	The report says Gabriel conveyed that Paradise and Hell would not have been created without the Prophet ﷺ. Its chain is weak, and al-Albānī questioned its reliability. المكتبة السنية +1
Al-Aḥādīth al-Mawḍūʿah, al-Ṣaghānī	No reliable prophetic chain established for the famous wording	The wording “Were it not for you, I would not have created the celestial spheres” is classified as fabricated. الإسلام سؤال وجواب +1

One important distinction: al-Ḥākim judged the report in al-Mustadrak authentic according to his assessment, but al-Dhahabī challenged that assessment. The existence of a report in al-Mustadrak therefore does not settle its authenticity.

The careful conclusion is that these reports exist in Islamic literature, but their attribution to the Prophet ﷺ is not reliably established. That does not by itself settle the theological question of the Prophet's status; it means that this particular claim should not be presented as a proven statement of the Prophet ﷺ.

Convert to PDF

Life time of Al-Mustadrak, al-Ḥākim,

Imām al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī (أبو عبد الله الحاكم النيسابوري) lived from 321 AH to 405 AH, approximately 933 CE to 1014 CE.

• Born: 321 AH / 933 CE, in Nishapur, Persia (present-day Iran).

• Died: 405 AH / 1014 CE, in Nishapur.

• Famous work: Al-Mustadrak ʿalā al-Ṣaḥīḥayn (المستدرك على الصحيحين), a hadith collection intended to gather narrations that al-Ḥākim considered to meet the criteria of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim but that they had not included.

Historical significance: Al-Ḥākim lived more than three centuries after Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, who died in 11 AH / 632 CE. Therefore, a narration in Al-Mustadrak is not automatically authentic merely because it appears in that book; its chain of transmission and the assessments of hadith scholars must also be examined.

Convert to PDF

Life time of Musnad al-Firdaws, al-Daylamī

Abū Shujāʿ al-Daylamī (أبو شجاع الديلمي), the author associated with Musnad al-Firdaws, lived approximately from the 5th to the 6th century AH.

A distinction is important:

• Al-Daylamī: Commonly identified as Abū Shujāʿ Shīrawayh ibn Shahrad al-Daylamī, who died in 509 AH / 1115 CE.

• His work: Musnad al-Firdaws (مسند الفردوس), a collection of hadith reports.

• His son: Zayn al-Dīn al-Daylamī, who compiled al-Firdaws bi-Maʾthūr al-Khiṭāb from his father's material.

Al-Daylamī lived roughly five centuries after Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, who died in 11 AH / 632 CE.

Important: The date of the compiler does not determine whether a hadith is authentic. The individual report's chain of transmission (isnād) must be assessed separately.

Convert to PDF

Life time of Al-Aḥādīth al-Mawḍūʿah, al-Ṣaghānī

Al-Ṣaghānī (الصغاني), the hadith scholar associated with Al-Aḥādīth al-Mawḍūʿah (الأحاديث الموضوعة), lived from approximately 577 AH to 650 AH (1181–1252 CE).

• Born: 577 AH / 1181 CE, in Lahore.

• Died: 650 AH / 1252 CE, in Baghdad; he was subsequently buried in Makkah.

• Full name: Raḍī al-Dīn Abū al-Faḍāʾil al-Ḥasan ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣaghānī.

  

  dorar.net

  +1

Note: His lifetime is generally given as 577–650 AH. There is some disagreement over his birth date, but 577 AH is the commonly accepted date.

DergiPark

+1

Convert to PDF

How was this conversation?

Your feedback helps us improve how Voice speaks, listens, and sounds

No Evidence on that husband can not touch or see wife after death in tislam

 No Evidence on that husband can not touch or see wife after death in tislam

There is no universally accepted Islamic evidence that a husband is forbidden to see or touch his deceased wife. The issue of seeing her is different from the issue of washing her body, and the jurists have disagreed particularly about whether the husband may perform her funeral ghusl.

1. Evidence from the Prophet ﷺ

The strongest evidence against an absolute prohibition is a narration concerning the Prophet ﷺ and his wife ʿA’ishah (RA).

The Prophet ﷺ said to her, according to a narration recorded by Ibn Mājah:

“What would harm you if you died before me, so that I could wash you, shroud you, pray over you, and bury you?”

— Sunan Ibn Mājah, Hadith 1465 in some numbering systems; the narration is graded authentic by some hadith scholars.

Islam Question & Answer

+1

Significance: The Prophet ﷺ contemplated washing his wife after her death. This is strong evidence against claiming that Islamic law universally forbids a husband from touching his deceased wife.

2. Evidence from the Companions

• ʿAlī (RA) and Fāṭimah (RA): Reports state that ʿAlī washed Fāṭimah after her death. This is cited by the Mālikī, Shāfiʿī and Ḥanbalī schools in support of permitting a husband to wash his deceased wife.

  

  Islam Question & Answer

  +1

• Asmāʾ bint ʿUmays (RA) and Abū Bakr (RA): Abū Bakr instructed that his wife wash him after his death, and she did so. This supports the permissibility of a wife seeing and washing her deceased husband.

  

  Islam Question & Answer

  +1

3. Why do some scholars prohibit a husband from washing his deceased wife?

The Ḥanafī school holds that the marriage bond terminates upon the wife's death for the purpose of this ruling. Consequently, according to its standard position, the husband may not perform her ritual washing.

However, the Ḥanafī position distinguishes between washing and seeing: some Ḥanafī authorities permit the husband to see his deceased wife's face and hands, while restrictions apply to physical contact. Some rulings also permit touching through a cloth or other barrier.

IslamQA

+2

The majority position, represented by the Mālikī, Shāfiʿī and Ḥanbalī schools, permits the husband to wash his deceased wife, relying on the reports mentioned above.

A husband washing his deceased wife...

+1

4. Final conclusion

Question	Conclusion
Can a husband see his deceased wife?	There is no sound, universally accepted prohibition; even Ḥanafī authorities permit seeing her face and hands.
Can he touch her body?	The ruling differs by school and circumstances.
Can he wash her body for burial?	Permitted by the majority; prohibited under the standard Ḥanafī position.
Is there an explicit Qur'anic verse forbidding seeing or touching a deceased wife?	No explicit verse states such a prohibition.

My conclusion: It would be inaccurate to claim that Islam unanimously forbids a husband from seeing or touching his deceased wife. There is a genuine disagreement about washing her, but the prophetic narration concerning ʿĀʾishah (RA) provides significant evidence against a blanket prohibition. Whether ordinary affectionate contact, such as embracing or kissing her, is permitted should be assessed separately under the relevant school's rules; the evidence about washing does not automatically settle every form of contact.

Meaning of “What would harm you if you died before me, so that I could wash you, shroud you, pray over you, and bury you?”

The meaning of the statement attributed to Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is:

“What harm would there be to you if you died before me, so that I could wash you, shroud you, perform the funeral prayer over you, and bury you?”

Let us examine the meaning carefully.

• “If you died before me” — the Prophet ﷺ is speaking hypothetically about his wife ʿĀ’ishah (RA) dying before him.

• “So that I could wash you” — he is expressing the possibility of personally washing her body after her death.

• “Shroud you” — wrap her body in the burial cloth.

• “Pray over you” — perform the funeral prayer (Ṣalāt al-Janāzah) for her.

• “Bury you” — place her body in the grave.

What does the statement imply?

The expression is not a prohibition. It expresses a hypothetical situation in which the Prophet ﷺ would carry out these funeral duties for his deceased wife.

The Arabic wording commonly cited is:

مَا ضَرَّكِ لَوْ مِتِّ قَبْلِي فَغَسَّلْتُكِ وَكَفَّنْتُكِ وَصَلَّيْتُ عَلَيْكِ وَدَفَنْتُكِ

The important phrase is فَغَسَّلْتُكِ — fa-ghassaltuki, meaning “so that I washed you” or “then I would wash you,” depending on how the hypothetical construction is rendered in English.

Conclusion: The statement supports the view that a husband may wash his deceased wife. It does not say that he is forbidden to see or touch her after death. However, the authenticity and precise wording of the report should be checked before using it as decisive evidence in a legal argument.

Meaning of “What harm would there be to you

“What harm would there be to you?” means “What would be wrong with it for you?” or “How would it harm you?”

In Arabic:

مَا ضَرَّكِ (mā ḍarraki)

• مَا (mā) — what?

• ضَرَّ (ḍarra) — harmed / caused harm.

• كِ (ki) — you (feminine singular), referring to ʿĀ’ishah (RA).

Literally, the expression is approximately “What harmed you?” or, in its rhetorical sense, “What harm would it cause you?”

In the full sentence, مَا ضَرَّكِ لَوْ مِتِّ قَبْلِي, the meaning is:

“What harm would there be to you if you died before me?”

It is a rhetorical question: the speaker is asking what disadvantage there would be to her in that hypothetical situation. It is not an instruction or a prohibition.

The Ḥanafī school holds that the marriage bond terminates upon the wife's death for the purpose of this ruling. Consequently, according to its standard position, the husband may not perform her ritual washing. basis of it

The basis of the Ḥanafī position that a husband may not perform the ritual washing (ghusl) of his deceased wife is a particular legal interpretation of the effect of death on the marriage relationship. It is a matter of fiqh (jurisprudence), not an explicit Qur’anic verse saying that a husband cannot wash his deceased wife.

The key question is: Does the marriage relationship continue after death sufficiently to permit the husband to wash his wife, or does death end the relevant legal permission?

1. The principal Ḥanafī reasoning

A Ḥanafī fatwa from Daruliftaa.com explains the reasoning as follows:

IslamQA

+1

1. Death ends the relevant marital permission: According to the Ḥanafī legal analysis, the husband's right to physical contact with his wife does not continue after her death in the same way as the wife's rights after her husband's death.

2. The waiting period (ʿiddah) differs: A widow must observe ʿiddah, whereas a man does not have to observe a corresponding waiting period after his wife's death. He may marry her sister after her death, subject to the usual rules.

3. The rule for washing follows the rule on looking and touching: The Ḥanafī jurists reason that the person performing the ritual washing must be legally permitted to look at the deceased's body in the manner required for washing. Since they restrict the husband's physical contact with his deceased wife, they do not permit him to wash her.

The third point is the immediate legal reasoning; the first two are used to support the distinction between the spouses.

2. What classical sources support this position?

The relevant sources include:

• Al-Durr al-Mukhtār, with Ibn ʿĀbidīn's commentary, Radd al-Muḥtār — discusses the prohibition on a husband washing or directly touching his deceased wife, while permitting him to look at her.

• Al-Muwaṭṭaʾ of Imām Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī — contains material concerning a wife washing her deceased husband and the Ḥanafī legal position.

• Iʿlāʾ al-Sunan, by Ẓafar Aḥmad al-ʿUthmānī — discusses the relevant reports and the difference between the Ḥanafī position and the majority view.

  

  IslamQA

  +1

3. Is this reasoning explicitly stated in the Qur'an?

No. The Qur'an does not explicitly state that a husband's marriage bond ends at his wife's death for the purpose of deciding who may wash her body. That is a juristic inference.

There is also a counterargument from the prophetic report in Sunan Ibn Mājah 1465, in which the Prophet ﷺ says he would wash, shroud, pray over and bury ʿĀʾishah (RA) if she died before him. The grading of this report differs among hadith scholars: Darussalam grades it weak, while al-Albānī grades it ḥasan.

Sunnah

+1

The majority of Mālikī, Shāfiʿī and Ḥanbalī jurists permit a husband to wash his deceased wife, relying on this report and the report that ʿAlī (RA) washed Fāṭimah (RA).

A husband washing his deceased wife...

+1

Conclusion: The Ḥanafī ruling is based on a school-specific interpretation of the legal consequences of death, not an explicit Qur'anic prohibition. If your question is whether the Qur'an itself establishes that a husband cannot see or touch his deceased wife, the answer is no