Posts

The basic questions for refuting the Darwin's theory of evolution.

 I am throwing basic questions for answers to those who support Darwin's theory of evolution: 1. If apes evolve into human then he will not have any parents. Have you found any human without parents? 2. If ape evolves into human then many human will come out  of zoos because there are hundreds of apes in the zoos for thousands of years. Have you found such instances? 3. There are millions of dogs and pigs and others around us. Have you ever found that dogs or pigs or apes evolved into human or other animals? 4. As theory of evolution, it's continuous process and if it so, have you ever found that human evolved into other species? 5. If evolution works  then human beings would not give birth enduring pain and would have apes and after few years these apes would evolve into human beings. Have you found such examples? 6. If evolution theory really works then there would be such human beings who were unknown in the society and those people wouldn't have any parents, sister and

Refutation of theory of evolution of Darwin in light of science and reality: How Darwinism ideology breaks down in light of Modern Science and reality.

  Refutation of theory of evolution of Darwin in light of science and reality: Anyone who seeks an answer to the question of how living things, including himself, came into existence, will encounter two distinct explanations. The first is the fact that all living things were created by the All-Wise and Almighty Allah. The second explanation is the theory of "evolution," which claims that living things are the products of coincidental causes and natural processes. For a century and a half now, the theory of evolution has received extensive support from the scientific community. The science of biology is defined in terms of evolutionist concepts. That is why, between the two explanations of creation and evolution, the majority of people assume the evolutionist explanation to be scientific. Accordingly, they believe evolution to be a theory supported by the observational findings of science, while creation is thought to be a belief based on faith. As a matter of fact, however, s